The vast majority of states in the nation now have a system in place (whether state-run or nonprofit) to provide hunters the option of donating game meat to those in need. However, processors’ ability to participate in donation programs may be limited by state contract or license agreements that require them to carry arduous liability insurance policies. In some instances, these liability insurance requirements have now become a barrier for processors to participate in the program.
Throughout the country, hunters are working proactively within their communities to curb hunger through game meat donation programs (Page 10). The vast majority of states in the nation now have some system in place (whether state-run or nonprofit) to provide hunters the option of donating game meat to people in need. However, processors’ ability to participate in donation programs may be limited by state contract or license agreements that require them to carry arduous liability insurance policies. Currently Delaware, Indiana, and Michigan require processors to carry liability insurance in order to participate in game meat donation programs. Some non-profit programs, such as Farmers and Hunters Feeding the Hungry (which currently has chapters in 26 states) , also require participating processors to carry liability insurance. In some instances, these liability insurance requirements have now become a barrier for processors to participate in the program.
Points of Interest
- In Delaware, participating processors must contract with the state when joining the Sportsmen Against Hunger program, which involves a mandatory $1 million per occurrence and $3 million aggregate liability insurance policy (as opposed to the standard limits of $1/ $2 million that most insurance companies offer). The higher coverage requirements result in an additional $250 in costs for the processors and has, in part, contributed to over 20% of the previously participating processors withdrawing from the program. As a result, venison donations were 2,500 pounds lower in 2015 compared to the year prior .
- In 1996, Pennsylvania became one of the first states to enact legislation protecting processors from liability, thereby negating the need to carry liability insurance. House Bill 664 amended the Donated Food Limited Liability Act to include wild game meat processors as being exempt from liability.
- In 2010, Tennessee passed Senate Bill 2726 establishing “good-faith donor” protection from liability for game meat processors wishing to donate to nonprofit organizations.
- Most recently, in 2016, Rhode Island lawmakers proposed Senate Bill 2411 to provide immunity from liability to game meat processors donating excess product.
- Although several other states have some form of protection for food donors, many of those states do not specifically protect game meat donors or processors.
- The Donated Food Limited Liability Act in Pennsylvania became law in 1981 and PA HB 664 amended the Act in 1996 to include wild game meat donations as authorized products to be included in protection from liability. “Any bona fide charitable or religious organization which receives, in good faith, donated food for ultimate distribution to needy individuals, either for free or for a nominal fee, shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability arising from the condition of such food, if the charitable or religious organization [reasonably] does all of the following: (1) reasonably inspects the food, at the time of donation and at the time of distribution, and finds the food fit for human consumption. (2) in the case of game animals or game birds, reasonably processes, prepares and distributes the food.”
- TN SB 2726 – “No good-faith donor of any apparently wholesome deer meat, fit for human consumption, to a charitable or nonprofit organization shall be subject to civil damages arising from the condition of the food, unless an injury is caused by the negligence, recklessness or intentional conduct of the donor."
In recognition of the valuable role hunters and game meat processors play in providing high-quality food to those less fortunate, state legislators are encouraged to consider implementing liability exemptions for game processors to facilitate the continuation and expansion of the programs available in their state. Legislators may also consider the implementation of release of liability waivers from recipients of donated game meat to help alleviate the requirements for additional or excessive liability insurance.
For more information regarding this issue, please contact Zachary Sheldon at email@example.com.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Which of these considered changes do you believe would have the most positive impact on management of the recreational red snapper fishery in the Gulf of Mexico?Vote Here
- Granting full management authority (stock assessments, management of both commercial and recreational sectors, etc.) to the five Gulf states. (35.00%)
- Extending the states’ current 9-mile management jurisdictions to 25 miles. (20.00%)
- Permanently allow each state to manage its recreational sector allocation out to 200 nautical miles. (20.00%)
- Use of more appropriate management models, such as rate of harvest, rather than the commercial hard-poundage quota system currently in place. (20.00%)
- Inclusion of additional, non-federal data in stock assessments. (5.00%)