By Soren Nelson, Pacific Southwest States Coordinator
On September 30, California Governor Jerry Brown vetoed Senate Bill 1487. This bill, which would have banned the importation of 11 African species, was opposed by a broad coalition of sportsmen’s and conservation organizations, including the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF).
“Wildlife management should be guided by science, not by emotion,” remarked CSF’s Pacific Southwest States Coordinator, Soren Nelson. “Legal, regulated hunting of African species has proven to be a wildly successful tool for their management and recovery, just as it has here in the United States, and I applaud the Governor for vetoing this misguided legislation.”
In the Governor’s veto message, he noted that this legislation would have been unenforceable under federal law, stating, “SB 1487 would have imposed a state civil penalty for activities expressly authorized by the U.S. Endangered Species Act.”
Revenue generated by licensed, regulated hunting is the single most important source of funding for conservation and anti-poaching efforts in Africa. In many Southern and Eastern African countries, revenues generated from licensed, regulated hunting are the primary source of management, conservation, and anti-poaching funds for national wildlife authorities. These hunting programs have been designed by experts to allow a limited, sustainable harvest, and to generate funds for conservation, anti-poaching enforcement, and community incentives. This system has helped recover or maintain “Big 5” populations in Southern and Eastern Africa.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has been making the headlines recently, with several new states and a Canadian province testing positive for the disease, and many states implementing new rules to prevent its spread. How has this increased public awareness of CWD affected you?Vote Here
- It has affected my ability to participate in game meat donation programs (2.53%)
- I have altered how I plan and conduct my hunts (26.58%)
- My perception on how healthy venison is has changed (30.38%)
- It has not affected me (40.51%)