By Brent Miller, Senior Director, Northeastern States
Last week, the Connecticut General Assembly adjourned their 2018 regular session without many bills on sportsmen’s issues making it across the finish line. However, a flourish of activity was occurring behind the scenes as conservation groups united behind members of the bipartisan Connecticut Legislative Sportsmen’s Caucus to defeat an anti-sportsmen’s bill that would have shut down waterfowl hunting on a section of the Quinnipiac River.
SB 109, sponsored by Senator Martin Looney, President Pro Tempore of the Connecticut Senate, would have legislatively established a wildlife refuge, effectively closing all hunting in the area. On May 1, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) was joined by 12 other state and national sportsmen-conservation organizations in submitting a letter to all Senators urging them not to support the bill.
As stated in the letter, “SB 109 usurps the authority of, and undermines the existing processes in place at, the DEEP [Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection] to determine when areas of the state are deemed inappropriate to remain open to hunting. This legislation not only reduces hunting opportunities in the state of Connecticut, at a time when hunting access is reported as the biggest barrier to recruiting new and lapsed hunters, but it also sets a dangerous precedent for how decisions impacting the regulation of hunting are made in the future.”
The Connecticut Legislative Sportsmen’s Caucus worked against this bill to ensure that fish and wildlife decisions remain in the hands of the fish and wildlife professionals at the DEEP.
The following organizations also stood united in collective opposition: American Woodcock Society, Connecticut Waterfowlers Association, Delta Waterfowl, Ducks Unlimited, National Deer Alliance, National Rifle Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation, National Wild Turkey Federation, Quality Deer Management Association, Ruffed Grouse Society, Safari Club International, and Sportsmen’s Alliance.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Which of the following do you think would most effectively support increasing hunting participation numbers?Vote Here
- Improve hunter and target shooter involvement in regulatory and legislative processes. (11.67%)
- Enact or expand temporary hunter education deferral programs (apprentice license programs, multiyear options, programs for all first-time hunters regardless of age, and programs promoting hunting of multiple game species). (11.67%)
- Offer shooting sports and hunter education as school activities and recreation programs. (65.00%)
- Link existing programming into family-oriented organizations (such as churches and home-school groups) where participants will have the social support to continue. (11.67%)