Contact: Joe Mullin, New England States Coordinator
On February 5, the Maine Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife reported out LD 965 as “Ought Not to Pass.” This legislation would have prohibited fishing in inland waters using nonbiodegradable hooks or certain non-biodegradable artificial lures.
The Committee held multiple work sessions over the past two weeks, taking into consideration a report that had been amassed by the stakeholder committee that was established during last year’s regular sessions. This focus-group included several science-based angling organizations that work closely with the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) on sportsmen-related policies in Maine and across the nation. Also serving on this stakeholder committee was a member of the Maine Legislative Sportsmen’s Caucus Advisory Council.
Maine has encountered legislation such as LD 695 in the past, but a 2014 report issued by the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife that delved into the ecological effects of non-biodegradable lures concluded that no lawmaking on the issue was necessary. CSF submitted testimony in opposition to LD 695 as it was introduced in 2019, and later commended the Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife for its decision to rest the issue with a focus group.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Recently, Virginia has proposed legislation that would make the punishment for poaching, in their state, a 1-5 year prison sentence through HB-449. Poaching undermines the social acceptance of hunters, jobs, recreation, local and state economies, and conservation efforts. How should poachers be punished?Vote Here
- By sentencing them to jail time. (37.25%)
- By giving them a cash fine. (12.75%)
- By banning their hunting and fishing privileges and their ability to buy the necessary licenses. (15.69%)
- By putting them on a probation period. (0.98%)
- There should be some discretion in the penalties depending on the motivations for the poaching incident. (33.33%)