On February 6, Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) Central Midwestern States Coordinator Joel Hodgdon, spoke at a luncheon during the Conservation Federation of Missouri’s (CFM) annual Media Camp event.
CFM, an important partner of CSF, was established in 1935 and is the largest and most representative conservation group in Missouri. Made up of over 90 affiliate organizations and thousands of members, CFM’s mission is to “ensure conservation of Missouri’s wildlife and natural resources, and preservation of our state’s rich outdoor heritage through advocacy, education, and partnerships.” The organization is also the Missouri affiliate for the National Wildlife Federation.
“Informing the general public about how vital hunting and angling are to conservation is more important today than ever. Working with the media at this event and others is one important way to help educate folks about the immense contributions of sportsmen and women,” said CFM Executive Director Brandon Butler. “We are happy to work with the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation and all of our great partners at this event.”
Hodgdon spoke about CSF, the National Assembly of Sportsmen’s Caucuses (NASC) program, the Missouri Legislative Sportsmen’s Caucus, and the importance of hunting and angling to the Missouri economy.
“Sportsmen and women in this state spend roughly $2 billion dollars a year on their outdoor pursuits, supporting close to 30,000 jobs.” said Hodgdon. “The Show Me State’s hunters and anglers also contribute heavily to the conservation of the natural resources that all Missourian’s enjoy. In 2017 alone, the sale of hunting and fishing licenses raised about $35 million dollars for conservation.”
Share this page
Your opinion counts
What do you think is the biggest obstacle that deters younger individuals from joining the hunting community?Vote Here
- Lack of access to hunting areas (27.27%)
- Lack of a mentor or instructor to take them (21.21%)
- Age limit restrictions on when they can purchase a license (1.52%)
- Lack of time or competing interests (19.70%)
- Technology (social media, phones, computers) (12.12%)
- Perceived negative public or peer-group opinions (18.18%)