Airbow and airgun legality for hunting use varies by state. Where some limit airgun use based on minimum calibers, velocities and ammunition grain weights based on the game species, other states do not mention airguns at all, leaving ambiguity in the minds of prospective users. As advances in technology continue, legislators are generally encouraged to work alongside their state fish and wildlife agency to ensure that the laws and regulations related to new technologies are clearly stated; and, more specifically, to consider the inclusion of Airbows and airguns in their state’s existing firearms seasons.
An airgun propels projectiles by means of compressed air or other gas, rather than using an explosive charge like a traditional firearm. Regulations surrounding the use of airguns vary significantly from state to state. Based on airgun technology, the arrow shooting airgun – a hybrid hunting product that uses compressed air to fire an arrow – has now been developed. Today’s airguns, and now the arrow shooting airgun, demonstrate a striking advancement in this technology beyond the BB and pellet guns of yesteryear. Many of the products available on the market today fire larger caliber projectiles (or arrows) and now offer shooters an expanded kill range (up to 100 yards) with a product that is capable of harvesting big game animals. Unlike other hunting implements, airguns and arrow shooting airguns do not support the American System of Conservation Funding through excise taxes, and therefore, the sale and use of these devices does not contribute to the conservation efforts of state fish and wildlife agencies as do more traditional methods of take.
Airgun technology dates to the earliest days of the United States. Lewis and Clark famously utilized a .46 caliber air rifle in their expedition following the Louisiana Purchase in 1804. Today, large bore airguns can ethically harvest many of the most popular game species, and are presently legal methods of take for white-tailed deer and/or other medium-large game in 21 states.
Airgun legality for hunting use varies by state. Where some limit airgun use based on minimum calibers, velocities, and ammunition grain weights based on the game species, other states do not mention airguns at all. Further, the majority of the states prohibit the use of airguns and arrow shooting airguns for big game hunting entirely. This variation between states leaves ambiguity in the minds of prospective users and manufacturers, which is why manufacturers often ask prospective users to confirm local regulations in their respective state before trying to hunt with airguns. To date no state has entirely legalized the use of arrow shooting airguns in archery-only seasons, and the Archery Trade Association has released a position that states that arrow shooting airguns are not archery equipment.
Unlike other hunting implements, airguns and arrow shooting airguns do not get taxed through the ASCF, and therefore, their sale and use does not contribute to conservation efforts in the same manner as firearms and archery equipment. By authorizing the use of this equipment without some sort of structure in place to ensure that this technology pays into the ASCF, state fish and wildlife agencies are losing out on conservation funding when sportsmen and women purchase these products instead of more traditional hunting implements such as bows, crossbows, muzzleloaders, and firearms.
While the cleanest solution to this issue would be to include airguns alongside other methods of take as items taxed through the Wildlife Restoration Program (Pittman-Robertson), doing so would require a change in federal tax statute which can take many years to achieve. In the interim, states can implement a Conservation Airgun Stamp, which sportsmen and women who wish to hunt with an airgun would be required to purchase alongside their other privileges, when purchasing their hunting licenses. This Stamp would be modeled after similar stamps/tags that are often required for other methods of take such as crossbows or muzzleloaders. The Conservation Airgun Stamp concept also benefits from having the support of the airgun industry, as such a stamp will allow for a more accurate assessment of how widely these devices are being used for hunting purposes, and will allow manufacturers to more effectively and efficiently market their products to targeted demographics and potential future customers.
Points of Interest
Like most handgun bullets, traditional muzzleloader round balls, and arrows tipped with broadheads, airgun pellets/bullets transmit little of the “shock” value on impact that is associated with high velocity (“high-powered”) rifle projectiles. Thus, an ethical harvest requires either (1) precise shot placement on a vital organ or, (2) sufficient projectile energy to create a wound channel that is large enough - or long enough - to cause fatality through blood loss. Large bore airguns and arrow shooting airguns provide a platform necessary to satisfy both criteria.
Unlike traditional firearms, many airguns and arrow shooting airguns are considered to be “hearing safe” in that they produce less than 140 dB of sound when fired (the Occupational Safety & Health Administration’s threshold for an impulse noise).
As advances in technology continue, legislators are generally encouraged to work alongside their state fish and wildlife agency to ensure that the laws and regulations related to new technologies are clearly stated and easily understood by sportsmen and women, which will help to eliminate ambiguity related to the use of these items afield. Until such time that airguns and arrow shooting airguns are included in the Pittman-Robertson Act, states are encouraged to implement state-level funding mechanisms such as a Conservation Airgun Stamp to ensure that all legal methods of take for hunting contribute into the conservation funding matrix. Unless there is a mechanism in place through which airguns and arrow shooting airguns contribute to conservation funding, states are dissuaded from authorizing them as a method of take during any hunting season.
For more information regarding this issue, please contact John Culclasure at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Studies conducted at both the state and federal level have found that the number of hunters and trappers have been on a generally declining trend over the past several decades. To increase recruitment, retention, and reactivation (R3) of hunters and trappers, which initiative do you think would have the greatest impact?Vote Here
- Increase the number of states with discounted license tailored to specific groups. (5.50%)
- Increase access to public lands. (25.17%)
- Provide more information for new participants. (4.07%)
- Provide hands on opportunities to improve skills and knowledge. (13.23%)
- Engage youth through hunter and conservation programs in schools. (43.01%)
- I feel we have enough sportsmen and women and do not believe R3 programs are necessary. (9.02%)