Contact: Joe Mullin, Assistant Manager, Northeastern States and States Program Assistant
- On April 21, the Maine Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife held a public hearing on three bills that would remove the Sunday hunting restriction – LD 1033, LD 1054, and LD 1212.
- Currently, Maine and Massachusetts are the only two states in the nation that have an outright ban on all forms of Sunday hunting.
- Sunday hunting prohibitions serve as a hurdle for existing sportsmen and women, a barrier to entry for those who are interested in learning to hunt, a limitation on the potential economic benefits that the state would otherwise be earning, and a restraint on private landowners’ abilities to earn additional income.
- The Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation’s (CSF) Joe Mullin, Assistant Manager, Northeastern States, submitted a letter of support that addressed all three of these bills and spoke in favor of removing the Sunday hunting ban during the Committee’s April 21 hearing.
Why it Matters: Much to the surprise of those not on the Atlantic coast, there are states, such as Maine, that do not allow sportsmen and women to hunt on Sundays. This dated prohibition is one of the last remaining examples of the puritanical blue laws that were initially designed to encourage church attendance. Unfortunately, the ban harms the sporting community in a variety of ways in addition to state and local economies. Many individuals are unable to head afield during the normal work week due to conflicts with jobs, school, and extra-curricular activities, and are thereby forced to make a cost-benefit decision when considering purchasing a hunting license. An additional day to hunt would mean more dollars spent by hunters in restaurants, hotels, gas stations and stores throughout the state, boosting the state’s economy. Allowing farmers and other landowners to diversify their income sources by allowing an additional day of hunting on their land will also help to provide a large capital influx to rural economies that are hardest hit by the recent pandemic.
As most states have already recognized, restrictions on specific activities on Sundays are antiquated and irrelevant in today’s society. Over the past decade, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia have all made significant changes to their Sunday hunting laws, and in the case of West Virginia, have eliminated all restrictions on hunting on Sundays. Support for these antiquated bans often relies on unfounded safety concerns and the general belief that you “don’t fix what isn’t broken.” However, these perspectives fail to recognize the variety of benefits realized by the state’s sporting community and economy, and often discount the perspective of private landowners that wish to allow hunting on Sundays.
In their own respective ways, LD 1033, LD 1054, and LD 1212, intend to afford families seven-day hunting opportunities, presenting the very real likelihood that the state will see increased hunting license sales, which under the American System of Conservation Funding, would mean more revenue for the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife for the purpose of carrying out critical conservation efforts.
Sunday hunting authorizations also reflect a strong support for landowner rights. Property owners already have the ability to limit or completely restrict access to their lands – these bills do not remove or change those capabilities. Instead, LD 1033, LD 1054, and LD 1212 would expand private property rights by allowing landowners to fully utilize their properties as they deem fit.
The Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation’s (CSF) Joe Mullin, Assistant Manager, Northeastern States, testified to the effect of these arguments during the April 21 hearing, and submitted a letter of support that favored each of these bills. CSF will continue to provide updates on the topic of Sunday hunting in Maine as they are made available.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Recently, two Montana state representatives have proposed more aggressive legislation addressing the state's gray wolf population. These bills range from the addition of a wolf tag into big game combination tags, to year-round sanctioned harvest without a license, use of snare traps, and private reimbursement of wolf harvest. Currently, the wolf population in Montana sits at 850 wolves, which is 700 over the state’s minimum recovery goal of 150 wolves. Which of the below options for wolf management do you support? (Select all that apply)Vote Here
- Regulated hunting under the management of the state fish and wildlife agency during a specific season (24.75%)
- Year-round hunting of wolves without a license (14.85%)
- The use of snares (trapping) without hunting allowances (1.98%)
- A combination of hunting and trapping during specific seasons regulated by the fish and wildlife agency (33.66%)
- The establishment of a bounty program to incentivize harvest during specific seasons (2.97%)
- Other (1.98%)
- I do not support the take of wolves (19.80%)