Contact: Brent Miller, Senior Director, Northeastern States
On February 4, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) was joined by 26 national and in-state conservation partners in submitting a letter opposing two bills in Maryland (House Bill 490 and House Bill 594). Both of these bills would authorize the sale of wild venison and undermine the dedicated work of sportsmen and women who’s laudable conservation efforts over the past century recovered white-tailed deer from an estimated 100,000 individuals nationwide to the burgeoning populations that are today present throughout their historical range.
The letter detailed the history of market hunting in the nation and the resulting collapse of many species which ushered in a new era of responsible, and regulated hunting with sportsmen and women leading the conservation movement to establish rules to regulate harvest, establish state fish and wildlife agencies, and provide a permanent funding structure for state-level conservation work through the American System of Conservation Funding. The letter further urged the consideration of this history in the evaluation of HB 490 and HB 594 to ensure a return to the darker days of wildlife exploitation does not occur.
To add insult to injury, HB 490 would reclassify wild deer as “livestock” for the purposes of bringing them to market, which denigrates the legacy of American sportsmen and women, state fish and wildlife agencies, and other conservationists, whose diligent work over the past century has resulted in the recovery of white-tailed deer being rightfully recognized as one of the greatest conservation success stories our nation has ever known.
At the time of this writing both bills have received a hearing in the House Environment and Transportation Committee, and we are now awaiting the official Committee report. CSF would like to thank all the partners who joined together to voice opposition to these proposals and extends a special thank you to Hunters of Maryland for their work in Annapolis to coordinate this issue and to ensure the message was heard throughout the House of Delegates.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Recently, two Montana state representatives have proposed more aggressive legislation addressing the state's gray wolf population. These bills range from the addition of a wolf tag into big game combination tags, to year-round sanctioned harvest without a license, use of snare traps, and private reimbursement of wolf harvest. Currently, the wolf population in Montana sits at 850 wolves, which is 700 over the state’s minimum recovery goal of 150 wolves. Which of the below options for wolf management do you support? (Select all that apply)Vote Here
- Regulated hunting under the management of the state fish and wildlife agency during a specific season (22.92%)
- Year-round hunting of wolves without a license (14.58%)
- The use of snares (trapping) without hunting allowances (2.08%)
- A combination of hunting and trapping during specific seasons regulated by the fish and wildlife agency (37.50%)
- The establishment of a bounty program to incentivize harvest during specific seasons (2.08%)
- Other (0.00%)
- I do not support the take of wolves (20.83%)