On February 5, the House passed H.R. 1620, the Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization Act, on a bipartisan suspension vote. This bill was also contained in H.R. 925, America’s Conservation Enhancement (ACE) Act, which recently passed the Senate on unanimous consent in early January.
H.R. 1620, introduced by Representative Elaine Luria (VA), will authorize a total of $455 million over the period of Fiscal Years (FY) 2020-2024, starting at $90 million for FY20 and increasing to $92 million by FY24, for on-the-ground programs to conserve the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. Established in 1983, the Program works with federal, state, and local governments as well as non-governmental organizations and academic institutions with the goal of conserving the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.
The Chesapeake Bay serves as a critical resource for America’s sportsmen and women. It is estimated that nearly one million waterfowl migrate to the Chesapeake for their wintering grounds, or nearly one-third of the Atlantic Coast’s migratory waterfowl population. Furthermore, it is estimated that 70-90 percent of all Atlantic Striped Bass, the region’s most popular fishery, annually spawn in the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization Act has also been included in H.R. 925, the ACE Act, which is a comprehensive package that includes many longstanding priorities for the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF). The swift passage and unanimous consent vote by the Senate is a significant step and clear commitment by the chamber to conserve fish and wildlife, and their associated habitats.
CSF urges the House to advance the ACE Act, H.R. 925, to be signed into law as currently written, which will ensure the Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization Act is also signed into law.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
In the past year ammunition sales have surged for a variety of reasons. As a result, many ammunition retailers have struggled to keep up with the demand and prices have increased dramatically for some of the more popular rounds. Has this affected your ability to enjoy hunting and recreational shooting activities?Vote Here
- Yes, I have been unable to purchase needed ammunition. (53.13%)
- Yes, I have had to pay higher costs to purchase needed ammunition. (18.75%)
- Yes, I have been unwilling to pay higher costs for ammunition and have decreased my participation in hunting and/or recreational shooting. (21.88%)
- No, my participation in hunting and/or recreational shooting has not been affected. (6.25%)