- Last week, Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus (CSC) Member Senator Jim Risch was joined by eight bipartisan Senators, including CSC Co-Chair Senator Marin Heinrich, CSC Vice-Chair Senator Joe Manchin, and six CSC members, in reintroducing the Modernizing Access to our Public Lands (MAPLand) Act (S. 904).
- MAPLand authorizes necessary financial resources for federal land management agencies to digitize public land mapping information.
- MAPLand will allow hunters, anglers, and recreational shooters to utilize digital and GPS technologies while enhancing recreation on public lands.
Why it matters: Digital mapping and GPS technologies have fundamentally changed how sportsmen and women traverse federal lands, however, inconsistent, and outdated record keeping practices among federal land management agencies hinders the ability of sportsmen and women to fully take advantage of these technologies. The digitization of public easements, access points, rights-of-way, and other mapping information on public lands is critically important to ensuring that sportsmen and women can navigate public lands in a safe and legal manner.
Millions of America’s hunters, anglers, and recreational shooters rely on public lands and waters for recreation. Before planning a trip to a new area, any sportsperson can attest to the fact they spend countless hours glossing over maps on their computers, or their handheld devices, to get a better idea of the land or waterscape. However, a lack of clear and publicly available information often deters sportsmen and women from recreating on a given piece of public land.
Unfortunately, federal land management agencies most important to sportsmen and women, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service, lack the necessary financial resources needed to digitize and modernize mapping information for the lands they manage.
Furthermore, for many land management agencies, much of the information is still held in paper format, which is concerning as easements and rights-of-way information could be lost if proper documentation is lost or destroyed. For example, it is estimated the U.S. Forest Service has only digitized roughly 5,000 of their 37,000 recorded easements.
To fill this void, the MAPLand Act will authorize necessary financial resources over three years for the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Army to accelerate the modernization and digitization of public land mapping information. The MAPLand Act also requires that federal land management agencies make their information publicly available on their respective websites so they can be easily accessible for the public.
If enacted, the MAPLAND Act would provide better information about easements and rights-of-way, whether roads and trails are open to the public, allowable types of vehicles, hunting and recreational shooting boundaries, and information on allowable types of watercraft – all of which is vital information for sportsmen and women.
On July 2, 2020, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) and conservation partners sent a letter to members of both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate urging the cosponsorship and support of the MAPLand Act to enhance outdoor recreation for sportsmen and women and other outdoor recreationalists. Modernizing mapping information is vital to bringing public land recreation into the 21st century.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Recently, two Montana state representatives have proposed more aggressive legislation addressing the state's gray wolf population. These bills range from the addition of a wolf tag into big game combination tags, to year-round sanctioned harvest without a license, use of snare traps, and private reimbursement of wolf harvest. Currently, the wolf population in Montana sits at 850 wolves, which is 700 over the state’s minimum recovery goal of 150 wolves. Which of the below options for wolf management do you support? (Select all that apply)Vote Here
- Regulated hunting under the management of the state fish and wildlife agency during a specific season (22.92%)
- Year-round hunting of wolves without a license (14.58%)
- The use of snares (trapping) without hunting allowances (2.08%)
- A combination of hunting and trapping during specific seasons regulated by the fish and wildlife agency (37.50%)
- The establishment of a bounty program to incentivize harvest during specific seasons (2.08%)
- Other (0.00%)
- I do not support the take of wolves (20.83%)