Contact: Joe Mullin, Assistant Manager, Northeastern States
- On February 10, the Vermont Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy convened for a virtual public hearing on three anti-sportsmen’s policies:
- During the hearing, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation’s (CSF) Assistant Manager for the Northeastern States, Joe Mullin, testified against all three bills, highlighting the dangerous precedents and ramifications that would result should any of these bills become law.
- As was previously reported, CSF submitted a letter of opposition to the Committee, citing a variety of concerns with each of these bills.
Why it Matters: State fish and wildlife agency boards and commissions have instrumental roles in setting the frameworks that result in the successful conservation and management of a state’s fish, wildlife, and their habitats. Sportsmen and women (including hunters, anglers, recreational shooters, and trappers) have played a crucial role in funding conservation efforts in the United States for over 80 years. The American System of Conservation Funding, a “user pays – public benefits” structure in which those who consumptively use public resources pay for the privilege, and in some cases the right to do so, has served a shining beacon for the management of fish, wildlife, and their habitats. Legislative efforts that restrict their pursuits, such as leghold trapping bans and prohibiting the use of dogs while coyote hunting, have the potential to thwart much-needed financial support away from state fish and wildlife agencies.
On February 10, CSF testified during a virtual hearing held by the Vermont Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy. CSF spoke in ardent opposition to three anti-sportsmen’s bills, S. 129, S. 201, and S. 281 – all of which threaten the continuation of the state’s sporting traditions and undermine the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department’s authority.
During the hearing, the Committee received an outpouring of opposition from the sporting community. In-state sportsmen and organizations, such as the Vermont Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, weighed-in by emphasizing the negative outcomes that would result should either of anti-sportsmen’s policies be implemented. Despite claims from those who wish to undermine Vermont’s sporting traditions, sportsmen and women in the Green Mountain State generated over $7.5 million for conservation in 2021 alone through hunting and fishing license sales.
CSF will continue to oppose restrictive, anti-sportsmen’s policies, such as S. 129, S. 201, and S. 281, wherever they may arise. Additional updates on these three bills will be provided as they are made available.
Share this page
Your opinion counts
Studies conducted at both the state and federal level have found that the number of hunters and trappers have been on a generally declining trend over the past several decades. To increase recruitment, retention, and reactivation (R3) of hunters and trappers, which initiative do you think would have the greatest impact?Vote Here
- Increase the number of states with discounted license tailored to specific groups. (5.29%)
- Increase access to public lands. (25.13%)
- Provide more information for new participants. (4.10%)
- Provide hands on opportunities to improve skills and knowledge. (13.05%)
- Engage youth through hunter and conservation programs in schools. (42.95%)
- I feel we have enough sportsmen and women and do not believe R3 programs are necessary. (9.47%)