October 25, 2021

CSF Supports Effort to Undo Crippling Decision Undermining Forest Health


Why it matters: The Cottonwood decision prevents our nation’s forest managers from utilizing active management practices to improve our forests including timber harvests, timber stand improvement, thinning, and prescribed fire, among others. As a result, our forest managers are limited in their ability to improve habitat, increase forest resiliency to reduce the threat of wildfire, control forest disease, and improve access for sportsmen and women. A Congressional fix to Cottonwood would remedy this hinderance and give our forest managers the flexibility they need to restore the health of our federal forests.

On October 20, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) and 32 of the nation’s leading sporting-conservation organizations sent a letter to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee in strong support of a legislative fix to the 2015 Cottonwood decision.

Despite bipartisan support for a solution to the Cottonwood decision, there has been no long-term solution. However, in the 2018, the Consolidated Appropriations Act did adjust consultation requirements for the USFS and BLM, but this is only a temporary fix as the adjusted requirements expire on March 23, 2023.

Wildfires on federal lands continue to negatively impact wildlife habitat and watershed health, particularly in the West. The U.S. Forest Service estimates that over 80 million acres need restoration, and Cottonwood related litigation continues to stymy forest health improvements projects. Reinitiating consultation at the plan when new information about a listed species or critical habitat becomes available is unnecessary and redundant as land management plans do not authorize on-the-ground projects, and individual projects adequately assess potential impacts to listed species on a project-by-project basis.

Remedying the Cottonwood decision is long overdue, and CSF will continue supporting efforts to fix Cottonwood.

Studies conducted at both the state and federal level have found that the number of hunters and trappers have been on a generally declining trend over the past several decades. To increase recruitment, retention, and reactivation (R3) of hunters and trappers, which initiative do you think would have the greatest impact?

View All news

Back TO All

In Season


Stay current with the latest news, policy activity and how to get involved.

Sign up for Newsletters


Donate today so we can keep fighting for tomorrow!

Donate Now