North Dakota’s 116,000 sportsmen contribute over $222 million into the state economy and support 3,464 jobs. Working with CSF in a coordinated effort to protect and promote the sportsmen’s traditions in North Dakota are members of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus and the North Dakota Legislative Sportsmen's Caucus.
For more information on the elected officials protecting and promoting the sportsmen’s traditions in North Dakota please contact Chris Horton.
Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus
North Dakota Members — Your representatives in Congress.
North Dakota Legislative Sportsmen's Caucus
Caucus Leadership — Your local representatives in state government
Senator Kelly Armstrong
Senator Erin Oban
Representative Corey Mock
Representative Todd Porter
North Dakota H 1419Apr 10
Provides an appropriation for a shooting sports grant program; relates to schools, clubs,…
North Dakota H 1017Feb 21
Provides an appropriation for defraying the expenses of the game and fish department.
- North Dakota S 2297Jan 24
- North Dakota S 2284Feb 2
- North Dakota S 2282Jan 23
- North Dakota H 1377Jan 23
- North Dakota H 1415Feb 6
- North Dakota H 1419Apr 10
- North Dakota S 2259Jan 18 View more legislative alerts »
- North Dakota: CSF Staff Attends Midwest Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Director’s MeetingJun 29
- North Dakota: Sportsmen’s Caucus Holds 3rd Annual Legislative ShootOct 12
- North Dakota: Caucus Leadership Advances Pro-Sportsmen Legislation In 2017Apr 27 View more media alerts »
Reports and Data
Your opinion counts
Which of these considered changes do you believe would have the most positive impact on management of the recreational red snapper fishery in the Gulf of Mexico?Vote Here
- Granting full management authority (stock assessments, management of both commercial and recreational sectors, etc.) to the five Gulf states. (33.33%)
- Extending the states’ current 9-mile management jurisdictions to 25 miles. (19.05%)
- Permanently allow each state to manage its recreational sector allocation out to 200 nautical miles. (19.05%)
- Use of more appropriate management models, such as rate of harvest, rather than the commercial hard-poundage quota system currently in place. (23.81%)
- Inclusion of additional, non-federal data in stock assessments. (4.76%)