April 12, 2021

Georgia Sportsmen’s Caucus Wants National Park Service to Hear Hunters Out

Contact: Mark Lance, Southeastern States Coordinator


Why it Matters: Hunting and fishing are critical aspects of Georgia’s cultural heritage. Establishing a new NPS unit could limit hunting and fishing access on thousands of acres, many of which are currently under the management authority of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

The NPS is conducting a special resource study to determine whether the Ocmulgee River Corridor meets the criteria to be included as a unit of the NPS system. There are many publicly owned lands contained within this study area that are currently open to hunting. These areas include Bond Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, Oaky Woods WMA, Ocmulgee WMA, and Echeconnee Creek WMA. Two public boat ramps are also found in the study area, in addition to private lands that are popular for hunting.

Lack of access is often cited by hunters as a major barrier to hunter participation. The Caucus understands the importance of maintaining access for hunters while keeping the management authority of state-owned lands under the direction of the Georgia DNR to ensure the conservation, rather than preservation, of the state’s natural resources. 

While hunting is an important aspect of Georgia’s heritage, it also serves as an economic driver for the state’s economy. Georgia’s 1,059,000 sportsmen and women contribute approximately $54 million to fish and wildlife conservation each year through the American System of Conservation Funding. Hunters and anglers in the Peach State generate more than $2.3 billion to the state’s economy which helps support 39,640 jobs. Input from the sportsmen’s community must be considered by the NPS while conducting this study.

The Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation supports the Caucus in their efforts to protect hunting and angling access for Georgia’s sportsmen and women and will continue to monitor the Ocmulgee National Park and Preserve Initiative as it moves forward.

Studies conducted at both the state and federal level have found that the number of hunters and trappers have been on a generally declining trend over the past several decades. To increase recruitment, retention, and reactivation (R3) of hunters and trappers, which initiative do you think would have the greatest impact?

States Involved:

View All news

Back TO All

In Season


Stay current with the latest news, policy activity and how to get involved.

Sign up for Newsletters


Donate today so we can keep fighting for tomorrow!

Donate Now